In previous reports we have written about the risk of the 2024 market being an equity bubble — though not an extended one — and that bubble markets are always difficult to quantify since they are driven by a combination of liquidity, leverage, and greed, not fundamentals. Leverage was concentrated in brokerage margin accounts in the late 1990s and this made the leverage driving the 2000 peak easier to measure. Today leverage is widely dispersed, and investors use a variety of tools to multiply their buying power. Some of this is displayed by the historic asset and volume levels in options, futures, ETFs, and a variety of debt instruments.
The Carry Trade
Tight monetary policy and rising interest rates work against equity bubbles, which may explain why US investors have been riveted on when the Federal Reserve would begin to lower interest rates. But this narrow focus on the Fed may be why last week’s rate hike by the Bank of Japan came as a surprise. The BOJ’s first rate increase in 17 years pricked the global financial bubble by triggering a sharp rise in the yen and squeezing the yen carry trade. Yen-funded trades have been used to finance the acquisition of stocks for years and the amount of money in the carry trade is unknown. But since it is based upon a weak-to-stable currency and zero-to-low interest rates, the yen’s surge and the BOJ’s rate hike suddenly made this source of funding less viable.
Clearly, the events of the last few trading sessions and the unwinding of the carry trade is a liquidity event and not an economic issue. But the sizeable losses in equity markets imply there are many accounts still under water and the reverberations are apt to take days or weeks to understand. In the meantime, we remain cautious.
One way to measure risk after a liquidity event is to monitor market data, in particular, daily volume levels and 90% up and/or down days. Not surprisingly, August 5th was a 92% down day in the US market on volume that was nearly 30% above the 10-day average. It would not be unusual if there were more 90% down days in the weeks ahead. However, once a 90% up day appears on better-than-average volume, it is a sign that downside risk has been minimized. In short, while the chorus is singing “buy the dip” we would caution that a safer bet is to wait for a 90% up day. This is not a guarantee that the lows have been made, but historically it has shown that the downside risk is minimal.
The Larger Backdrop
However, the unwinding of the carry trade is not taking place in a vacuum. It is second quarter earnings season and in the long run, earnings will be more important for stock prices than the carry trade. But results for the quarter have been mixed. Disappointing results were reported by McDonald’s Corp. (MCD – $270.06) and Microsoft Corp. (MSFT – $399.61), while Meta Platforms, Inc. (META – $494.09) beat expectations. News such as Nvidia Corp.’s (NVDA – $104.25) delivery delay for its new Blackwell chip, Warren Buffett selling half of his stake in Apple Inc. (AAPL – $207.23), a recent Federal judge ruling that Google (Alphabet Inc. GOOG – $160.54) is a monopoly, Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN – $161.93) lowering forecasts for earnings and revenue, all weigh heavily on the big tech sector and these stocks have been at the core of the stock market’s advance in the last year.
And despite the large declines in the popular averages, the stock market remains richly valued. Based upon the LSEG IBES earnings estimate for calendar 2024, equities are trading at a PE of 21.5 times. When added to inflation of 3.0%, this sum of 24.5 is above the 23.8 level that defines an overvalued equity market. Based on next year’s 2025 estimate the PE falls to 18.7 times and the sum equals 21.7 which is at the high end of the neutral range. However, 2025 estimates may be high, particularly if the economy slows. See pages 10 and 11.
Economic Review
July’s employment report showing 114,000 new jobs and a 4.3% unemployment rate was not that weak, in our view. The 3-month average actually rose from 167,670 to 169,670 because April’s payrolls added a mere 108,000 jobs. What may have made investors nervous about July’s data is that the birth/death adjustment was a positive 246,000 which means the unadjusted not-seasonally-adjusted payrolls were negative 132,000 jobs in July. However, this was not the first month of negative payrolls before the birth/death adjustment. It also occurred two times in 2023 as well as in April and May of this year. See page 5. Investors reacted badly to the jobs report because they were already worried about earnings.
The unemployment rate rose from 4.05% to 4.25%, however, the average long-term rate is much higher at 5.7%. The unemployment rate for women rose from 4.3% to 4.5% while for men, the rate much lower, rising from 4.1% to 4.2%. Unemployment by level of education was more disparate. Those with less than a high school education saw unemployment jump from 5.3% to 6.5% in July. This is a worry. A high school degree but no college saw an increase from 4.1% to 4.7%. Those with some college rose from 3.5% to 3.8% and a bachelor’s degree or higher rate edged up from 2.6% to 2.7%. See page 6.
What concerns us is the year-over-year growth rate in employment in the household survey which has been below 1% YOY all year and fell from 0.12% YOY in June to 0.04% YOY in July. This month, the year-over-year growth rate in the establishment survey slipped to 1.6%, the second month in a row below the long-term average growth rate of 1.69%. These growth rates will be important to monitor because negative job growth has been an excellent forecaster of recessions. We are not there yet, but the trend is ominous. See pages 3 and 4.
The ISM non-manufacturing index rebounded from 49.6 to 54.5 in July, with all components except supplier deliveries rising for the month. The employment index jumped from 46.1 to 51.1. Conversely, the ISM manufacturing index declined in July from 48.5 to 46.8, with five components falling for the month, four increasing and one unchanged. The employment index was weak, slipping from 49.3 to 43.4. See page 8.
Total vehicle unit sales rose to 16.3 million in July, up from 15.6 million in June, but down 0.9% YOY. Despite July’s uptick, this pace is well below the 18.5 million units seen in April 2021 and October 2017. Pending home sales rose 4.8% in June, rebounding from May’s record low reading of 70.9, and with sales rising in all regions. Nevertheless, June’s index was down 2.6% YOY. See page 9.
Technicals
Monday’s sharp sell-off led to the Nasdaq Composite and the Russell 2000 index both successfully testing their 200-day moving averages on an intra-day basis. The SPX and DJIA are trading well above their 200-day MA’s. See page 12. Stocks to watch for signs of further weakness are Microsoft Corp. (MSFT-$399.61) and Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN-$161.93) which are currently trading below their respective 200-day moving averages. The 25-day up/down volume oscillator is 1.39 and in neutral territory after absorbing a 92% down day on August 5. This followed 90% down days seen on April 12, 2024, February 13, 2024, and December 20, 2023. The last 90% up day was recorded on December 13, 2023. This oscillator failed to reach an overbought reading on the last rally and therefore did not confirm the advance. We will be watching to see if the uptrend in this oscillator from the 2022 lows remains intact. If not, it would be a longer-term warning sign for the stock market.
Gail Dudack
PLEASE NOTE: Unless otherwise stated, the firm and any affiliated person or entity 1) either does not own any, or owns less than 1%, of the outstanding shares of any public company mentioned, 2) does not receive, and has not within the past 12 months received, investment banking compensation or other compensation from any public company mentioned, and 3) does not expect within the next three months to receive investment banking compensation or other compensation from any public company mentioned. The firm does not currently make markets in any public securities.
