If you own a business that is part of the traditional mainstream of any industry, you will probably be very skeptical of any innovative upstart that enters your world. Not all upstarts are disruptors, but some are, and a few are legendary. For example, in 1994, Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN – $226.65) led by Jeff Bezos, began a new online marketplace for books and soon became a massive disruptor to traditional bookstores. Not only did Amazon deal a major blow to Barnes and Noble (founded in 1873), but over time it changed the entire retail industry. Change is not easy for anyone. I remember being upset when the Borders bookstore closed in my neighborhood in 2011. Borders was a special place where I could take my young son on a Saturday morning, and he could peruse Manga (Japanese comic books) while I sipped a cappuccino at the instore coffee bar. I was an early skeptic of Amazon. Nevertheless, I am now an Amazon Prime member. Technology has and continues to change many industries, and artificial intelligence will take this to another level. In the end, bookstores have faded away, just like Blockbuster, the video store chain ended when streaming became available. It is impossible to say right now, but technology may also be changing politics.

President Trump has always been a disruptor. But in his second term, Elon Musk, and his expertise in technology, artificial intelligence, and business, may become a true disruptor of the political scene as we know it. By combining modern technology and business acumen to find redundancies, fraud, and dark pools of money in the political system, we wonder if Washington DC will ever be the same. Transparency of government money flows has been absent for generations and Washington DC is bereft of modern software systems and people who know how to use them. So, Elon Musk, by posting his findings on the DOGE website, is educating the voting public of the inner workings of federal agencies. This may be why we are seeing so much head spinning and uproar in the federal government this week. However, if this disruption actually results in reducing the federal deficit and making the government more efficient, we cannot imagine how anyone could be opposed. Nonetheless, it will mean many career federal workers will lose jobs and we doubt that they will go quietly.

The stock market has clearly taken the worries about tariffs in stride. The S&P 500 index scored a record high this week, and most of the other popular indices, including the Russell 2000 index, are not far behind. See page 11. Our 25-day up/down volume oscillator is at 2.77 and closing in on an overbought reading. In this indicator an overbought reading that lasts a minimum of five consecutive trading days or more, confirms a new high. What this would signal is that volume is supporting higher prices. See page 12. Last week’s American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) survey indicated that bullishness fell 4.9% to 28.4% and bearishness rose 4.4% to 47.3%. Bullishness has declined 15% in the last three weeks and bearishness has increased 18%. These numbers are close to a bull/bear split of 20/50 which is rare and favorable. The 8-week bull/bear is minus 2.6% and neutral but closing in on a positive reading of minus 7.0%. See page 14. In short, the technical backdrop of this stock market continues to be favorable.

Conversely, valuation is not supportive of equities, but this is not new. Momentum, hope, and sentiment have been overruling valuation for two years. The SPX trailing 4-quarter operating multiple is 25.8 times, and well above all long- and short-term averages. See page 9. However, we have noticed that analysts have been raising their 2024 earnings estimates as fourth quarter earnings season ends but simultaneously lowering estimates for 2025 and 2026. Fears of economic slowdown and higher inflation as a result of tariffs appear to be the underlying cause of earnings forecasts falling, but we believe this is overdone. If we are correct, there will be positive earnings surprises on the horizon and that should support equities. See page 10.

Recent inflation data was unfriendly, but the consensus has already shifted to no Fed rate cuts for the near future, so this did not impact financial markets. Headline CPI rose from 2.9% YOY to 3.0% YOY and core CPI increased from 3.2% YOY to 3.3% YOY. Owners’ equivalent rent remains high, but it did inch down from 4.8% YOY to 4.6% YOY. The areas of concern in January’s report were transportation, which rose 1% over the month, and 3.2% YOY, and eggs, which are now in short supply due to the avian flu. The index for meat, poultry, fish, and eggs soared to 6.1% YOY in January, up from 4.2% YOY in December, but egg inflation should be temporary. For January, food at home rose 1.9% YOY (up 0.1%), but food away from home fell to 3.4% YOY (down 0.2%). See page 3.

Service sector inflation is slowly ratcheting lower, but it remains high at 4.2% YOY. Services less rent of shelter was 3.9% YOY, down from 4%. However, most core indices have been trending up, not down in recent months. One of the Fed’s favorite inflation benchmarks is all items less food, shelter, and energy, and it rose to 2.3% YOY, up from 2.1% YOY in December. See page 4.

The PPI indices had relatively small changes in January. The finished goods index was 2.9% YOY, up from 2.8% YOY, and core finished goods rose 2.2% YOY down from 2.6% YOY. PPI final demand was 3.5%, unchanged from December, but still at the highest pace since February 2023. The main issue regarding these benchmarks is that rising inflation indices also mean the real fed funds rate is falling, leaving the Fed no room to lower rates. Unless inflation data improves in coming months, the consensus view could shift from Fed rate cuts to Fed rate hikes in 2025. See page 5.

January retail sales were solid. Advance estimates for total retail and food services sales for January 2025 were $723.9 billion (seasonally adjusted), down 0.9% on a monthly basis, but up 4.2% YOY. Total sales excluding motor vehicles and parts were up 3.7% YOY and excluding autos and gasoline stations were up 3.9% YOY. Motor vehicle & parts dealers rose a solid 6.4% YOY and gasoline stations increased 2.0% YOY. General merchandise store sales increased 3.7% YOY (an acceleration) and nonstore retailers rose 4.7% YOY (a deceleration). See page 6.

Industrial production rose 0.5% in January following an upwardly revised 1% gain in December. The overall industrial index rose 2% YOY. Manufacturing output rose 1% YOY and mining production rose 3.4% YOY. Utilities output, which can be volatile and weather-dependent, rose nearly 7% YOY. Overall, total capacity utilization rose from 77.5% to 77.8% YOY – the highest since August 2024 – and is back in line which levels seen prior to the pandemic. See page 7. Retail sales and industrial production reflect a healthy level of consumption and an expanding economy; however, the housing market is showing some signs of weakness. After three consecutive months of improvement, the pending home sales index fell from 78.5 to 74.2 in December. The National Association of Home Builders confidence index for February also fell for the first time in seven months, dropping from 47 to 42, with the greatest weakness seen in the expected sales over the next 6 months, which declined from 59 to 46. High mortgage rates are one of the reasons President Trump is lobbying for lower interest rates; but this is out of his control. Meanwhile, the housing sector may be slowing.

Gail Dudack

Click to Download

The 3-week-old Trump presidency continues to generate multiple headlines every day and this week was no exception. The big news was that the United States imposed a 25% tariff on imports of aluminum and steel and also cancelled exemptions for major suppliers such as Canada and Brazil. Trump also imposed a blanket 10% tariff on imports from top trading partner China and threatened a 25% barrier on all imports from Canada and Mexico, as well as looking at new reciprocal tariffs on imports of cars, computer chips and pharmaceuticals. These actions triggered condemnations by Mexico, Canada, and the European Union and ignited fears of a trade war; yet the stock market was unmoved. In our view, this stoic reaction by the market was rational because from a purely economic perspective these tariffs will be very troublesome for Mexico, Canada, China, and other major exporters to the US, but they are unlikely to be much of an issue domestically. And as we noted previously, a strong dollar will help to mute the impact of tariffs. More importantly, these tariffs are more likely to change the behavior of consumers and corporations and nullify much of the impact of tariffs. At least this is the long-term goal and US equities appear to have figured this out.

Gold has risen 16% since Trump was elected and the media has attributed this to the unpredictability of President Trump and the potential of trade wars; however, many precious metal analysts have noticed that demand for gold from abroad, particularly China, has increased and this is a reaction to their concern of weakness in their own currencies and a fear that tariffs will pressure their already declining economies. However, our favorite event of the week was the 30-minute press conference in the Oval Office with President Trump, Elon Musk, and X Musk, where Elon detailed much of what DOGE is doing and finding. Plus, Elon gave a mini course in business discipline and accounting. Nevertheless, the star was little X who clearly stole the show. (https://www.foxnews.com/video/6368671861112)

Overall, the story of the week was the resilience of the stock market even though a wave of tariffs were being imposed. Perhaps more surprisingly, our technical indicators improved this week. The 25-day up/down volume oscillator is at 1.42 this week, neutral and down a bit from two weeks ago when it was closing in on an overbought reading of 3.0 or greater. Nevertheless, it has a bullish bias. See page 14. The 10-day average of daily new highs is 162 this week and new lows are averaging 75. This combination of daily new highs above 100 and new lows below 100 is definitely positive. But the surprise of the week was the NYSE cumulative advance/decline line which made a new high on February 6, 2025. The previous high was made in November, generating a period of nonconfirmation; however, this new high confirms the current advance. See page 15. Last week’s AAII survey showed bullishness fell 7.7% to 33.3% and bearishness rose 8.9% to 42.9%. Bullishness is now below average, and bearishness is above average, which is a favorable combination for the equity market. See page 16. All in all, these indicators, along with the charts of the popular indices, are all bullish.

What is not bullish is the growing federal deficit. This is shown on page 3, with newly released data from the CBO, the fiscal 2024 (September 30, 2024) deficit was 6.2% of GDP. However, new Treasury data show federal debt subsequently grew $711 billion in the last three months of 2024, and the 12-month deficits-to-GDP rose to 6.9% (October), 7.1% (November), and 6.8% (December). This combination of rising deficits and rising interest rates has lifted interest payments as a percentage of outlays from 5.3% in 2020 to 13.1% in 2024. These deficit trends are unsustainable. See page 3.

Nonetheless, economic data has been favorable. The ISM nonmanufacturing index fell 1.2 points in January but continues to show an expanding service sector. See page 4. The NFIB small business survey dipped 2.3 points in January but remained above the long-term average of 98 for the third consecutive month. See page 5. The January employment report showed a 143,000 increase in the month of January, while revisions to previous months added an additional 100,000 more jobs. The household survey showed the unemployment rate fell slightly from 4.1% to 4.0% in the month. See page 6.

Unfortunately, the January employment release is a difficult report to analyze due to the annual benchmark revisions in the establishment survey, the Census population revisions to the household survey, and the updating of seasonal adjustments in both surveys. This year the establishment survey benchmark revision for March 2024, without seasonal adjustments, lowered employment by 598,000 workers, or 0.4%. This was unusually large since the typical revision is plus or minus 0.1%.

The population adjustment to the household survey increased the civilian noninstitutional population (age 16 and over) by 2.9 million and increases were substantial for Asians and Hispanics. The total civilian labor force increased 2.1 million, including an increase of 2.0 million in employment and 105,000 in unemployment. The number of people not in the labor force increased by 765,000. As is its usual practice, the BLS does not revise official household survey estimates for earlier months and therefore this bump in population is very obvious in many of the charts on the following pages. The uptick in January employment in the household survey depicts a 1.7% YOY growth rate, which is well above the long-term average of 1.5%. However, this spike in employment could be less an increase in real workers and more an increase in the Census Bureau’s estimate of population growth. Still, we are relieved that the household survey, which had been showing no employment growth for much of 2024, could simply have been an undercounting of both population and employment.

Nevertheless, the January report is dubious for a variety of reasons. We know that seasonal adjustments were revised in both surveys, however there were unusually large differences between the seasonal adjusted data and the not-seasonally-adjusted data this month. For example, January’s establishment survey showed the addition of 143,000 new jobs in seasonally adjusted data, and a loss of 2.85 million jobs in the not-seasonally adjusted data. That is a strangely large discrepancy.

In the household survey, January’s seasonally adjusted unemployment rate fell from 4.1% to 4.0%, but the unadjusted unemployment rate for those 16 and over rose from 3.7% to 4.2%. Unadjusted unemployment rates for men, women, and workers by level of education also rose in January. Only the not seasonally adjusted unemployment rate for those with less than a high school diploma actually fell from 5.6% to 5.2%. Those with a bachelor’s degree or higher saw their unemployment rate ease from 2.4% to 2.3%. But other educational categories saw a rise in their unemployment rates, contrary to the decline in the overall rate. Similarly, native versus foreign employment statistics, which are not seasonally adjusted, showed the native unemployment rate rising from 3.7% to 4.3% and the foreign unemployment rate rising from 4.3% to 4.6%. The seasonally adjusted employment-population ratio and labor force participation rates both rose 0.1% due to Census revisions, but the unadjusted employment population ratio fell from 59.3% to 57.6%. In sum, January’s job report is filled with contradictions. We wonder if Elon Musk and his minions can do something to improve government agency data.

Gail Dudack

Click to Download

The first two weeks of Donald Trump’s presidency have been both hectic and head-spinning. And while some might call these past few days chaotic, the new administration has definitely been impactful, transparent, accessible, and game changing. And despite a tremendous amount of pearl-clutching by the media, the much-telegraphed tariffs on goods from Mexico, Canada, and China did not hurt the financial markets like most economists expected. To date, what has materialized are postponements due to potential political agreements with Mexico and Canada. The objectives here appear to be the monitoring of both borders to help prevent illegal immigration and the smuggling of illegal and lethal fentanyl.

Tariffs and deals with China may be more difficult to resolve in the near term, but China is also pivotal in terms of illegal fentanyl and that may be one of the longer-term goals. Meanwhile, economists and analysts are revising forecasts on future corporate earnings, inflation, and the economy based upon the administration’s actions, but if one is honest, no one knows how the tariffs will play out, even the negotiators. These tariffs are part of a process and Trump’s administration is currently working on a vast number of negotiations making outcomes extremely difficult to predict. Most importantly, one should not let personal political views color one’s forecast. In our view, it is important to analyze economic data skeptically and to make predictions objectively and separately from media headlines.

What is known is that Donald Trump used tariffs successfully in his first term and it did not impact inflation. What it did do was change American and global corporate behavior and as a result China lost manufacturing to other areas of Asia, such as Vietnam, Malaysia, and Cambodia. President Trump has been clear that this is another one of his goals and he is using the threat of tariffs as a catalyst to bring manufacturing back to the US. It is important to remember that inflation was 1.9% YOY when Trump left office and President Biden maintained Trump’s tariffs when he came to office.

This time it is different however because inflation is already a problem and service sector inflation has been sticky for several months. Farmers are facing rising feed stock costs, and this will trickle down into higher food prices. On the other hand, energy prices are expected to move lower. This could offset some of these threats and a higher dollar will also mute the potential impact of tariffs on imported goods. (But it will also be a handicap for exporters.)

What is also known is that President Trump takes pride in his pledge of “promises made, promises kept,” and this will be the cornerstone of his four years. To this end, the key financial-related promises are to increase energy production, increase jobs, reduce or eliminate government waste, lower taxes, and put the US in better fiscal shape. While not being specific, in our view, putting the US in better fiscal shape is apt to include a mixture of boosting economic activity and shrinking annual deficits. This combination would thereby lower the total public debt-to-GDP ratio which rose to 120% as of December 19, 2024 (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/gfdegdq188S). These are ambitious goals, but goals that are difficult to challenge.

The last week has also been hectic in terms of corporate earnings and economic releases. According to an S&P earnings scorecard, of the 211 companies in the S&P 500 that have reported earnings for the fourth quarter, 76.8% reported above analyst expectations. In general, earnings have helped boost equity prices.

Economic releases were mixed this week. In December, personal income grew 5.3% YOY, disposable income grew 5% YOY, and real personal disposable income (RPDI) grew 2.4%. RPDI fell from 2.6% in November and was below the long-term average of 3.2% for the tenth month in a row. See page 4. Government workers had the largest increase in wages in December with a gain of 6.5% YOY, and this pattern of government wages growing faster than private sector wages, has been ongoing since November 2022. Manufacturing workers had minimal increases in wages in the last six months of 2024. Meanwhile, government transfer payments and supplements to wages were robust in 2024. See page 5.

Personal consumption expenditures rose 5.7% YOY in December and service sector expenditures grew 6.7% YOY. In short, the growth in spending was greater than wage growth for most households, so it was not surprising that the savings rate fell from 4.3% to 4.1% at year end. Given this decline in household savings and the persistent rise in prices, household consumption could encounter headwinds in 2025. See page 6.

Average weekly earnings grew 3.5% in December, which was above the 2.9% YOY rate of inflation. However, this gap is narrowing since wage growth has been decelerating and inflation accelerating in recent reports. The PCE deflator rose from 2.4% in November to 2.6% in December and core PCE deflator was unchanged at 2.8% YOY. These figures were a disappointment to the consensus, and it has led to a consensus view that the Fed is unlikely to cut rates again in the near future. We agree. As previously noted, our concern is that farmers are currently seeing a rise in core feed stocks, and this will be a future driver of food prices at home and at restaurants. See page 7.

Hopefully, lower energy prices will offset higher food prices in 2025, however the bigger issue is that core inflation indices have been trending flat to higher. The core PCE deflator was unchanged at 2.8% in December. Core PPI was 2.6%, up from 2.5%, and up for the second month in a row. Core CPI was 3.2% in December, down from 3.3%, but has been stuck at 3.3% for three months in a row. This is why we do not expect rate cuts in the near future. Moreover, the real fed funds rate (fed funds minus the PCE deflator) is currently 180 basis points, down from 300 basis point in August. In our opinion, the Fed’s neutral rate is when the real fed funds rate is 200 to 300 basis points. See page 8.

The most favorable economic release of the week was the ISM manufacturing index for January. It was 50.9 and above 50 for the first time in 26 months! Seven of the ten components were higher in the month. Customers’ inventories were unchanged, and the inventories index and order backlog index were lower. The employment index rose to 50.3 and was above 50 for the first time in eight months. The best component was new orders, which increased from 52.1 to 55.1. See page 9. Since the DeepSeek controversy, technology stocks have underperformed, and this can be seen in the performance of the indices. The DJIA is up 4.7% year-to-date, the S&P 500 and the Russell 2000 are up 2.7%, and the Nasdaq Composite is up only 1.8%. Nevertheless, all the indices are in relatively stable and favorable uptrends. See page 12. Our 25-day volume oscillator remains neutral but has a bullish bias. In summary, we would be a buyer on dips.

Gail Dudack

Click to Download

This week, Liang Wenfeng, the 39-year-old founder of Chinese AI startup DeepSeek, went from being a total unknown to a well-known market disruptor. Out of the blue DeepSeek launched an open-source free AI assistant that it says uses less data and was developed at a fraction of the cost of current services. This triggered a global selloff in technology stocks, and a rout in key stocks like Nvidia Corp. (NVDA – $128.99). Analysts are still determining what this will mean for the AI world. However, the downdraft in equity prices was short-lived, and most stocks rebounded the following day. Still, the controversy will remain. Even though DeepSeek’ s “free” AI is an attractive alternative to many around the world, it collects and stores all user data in China. If it is not TikTok, it is DeepSeek.

Despite the momentary shock of DeepSeek, both the S&P 500 and the Dow Jones Industrial Average remain just fractionally away from setting new all-time highs. The Nasdaq Composite, which was impacted the most by the news, is only 2.2% away from its recent high. The Russell 2000 index, which a few sessions ago was threatening to break below its 200-day moving average, has also rallied and is now above its 100-day moving average and approaching its 50-day moving average. All in all, the charts of the popular indices remain solidly bullish. See page 9.

A Positive Shift in Technicals

More importantly, the 25-day up/down volume oscillator is at 2.16 this week, in neutral territory, but up significantly from a week ago. In fact, it is closing in on an overbought reading of 3.0 or greater. This uptick in the volume oscillator materialized despite the DeepSeek collapse in equities. This is surprising, but 25 days ago the market experienced a 91% down volume day after the Federal Reserve shifted its forecast from four to two rate cuts this year. Twenty-five days later, or on January 27, 2025, downside volume was only 54% of total volume. In short, the DeepSeek decline did nothing to hurt our technical indicators. In fact, the indicator is closer to producing five consecutive days in overbought territory – which would confirm the current advance — than it was a week ago. See page 10.

In addition, the 10-day average of daily new highs is 178 this week and new lows are averaging 50. The combination of daily new highs above 100 and new lows below 100 is a major positive shift and swings this indicator from negative to positive. The NYSE advance/decline line last made a record high on November 29, 2024, but the disparity between this peak and current levels has been narrowed to a net 1880 issues. See page 11. In sum, breadth indicators have turned much more favorable this week.

Investor sentiment also had a big shift this week. The American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) survey showed bullish sentiment jumped 18.0% to 43.4% while bearishness fell 11.2% to 29.4%. Bullishness is no longer below average (and closing in on the positive 25% level), and bearishness is no longer above average. Both levels are currently neutral but note that sentiment came close to a positive signal a few weeks ago. See page 11.

Fed Week

The FOMC meets this week, but it should be uneventful. The CME forecasts a 97.3% probability that no change in policy will take place at this meeting, and we agree. See page 3. It has been our view that there would be two or less rate cuts in 2025. However, the enthusiasm of the small business community since the election could translate into more job growth and therefore no rate cuts in 2025. However, assessing job growth could become extremely difficult in coming months. The January employment report (to be released February 7, 2025) will contain a number of significant benchmark revisions. In August the Bureau of Labor Statistics estimated that one revision would lower the establishment survey by 818,000 jobs. In some cases, data will be revised back to April 2023, some data back to January 2020, and some data not at all. These changes occur every year but revisions typically average only 0.1%. The upcoming revision is anticipated to be a 0.5% decline, or five times the norm.

In addition, fourth quarter earnings releases are expected from 98 S&P 500 companies this week; and to date, the season has been impressive. Currently 81% of companies reporting have beaten expectations. If the post-Covid stimulus years are excluded, 81% would set a record. Equally important is the fact that only 4.34% of S&P companies repurchased 4% or more of their shares in the quarter. This is a relatively low percentage, and it means that the quality of earnings in the quarter is high. See page 3.  

Housing and Sentiment

The housing market displayed green shoots at the end of the year. New home sales climbed to 698,000 annualized units in December, up 6.7% YOY and back above the pre-pandemic average of 600,000. The inventory of new homes for sale was up 1% over the month and the months’ supply of inventory at the current pace of sales was 8.5. The median price for a new home was $427,000, up 2% from a year ago.

Existing-home sales rose to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4.24 million, up more than 9.3% YOY, the largest yearly increase since 2021. The median price of a new home was $404,400, up 6% from a year earlier. The months’ supply of existing homes for sale fell from 3.8 to 3.3 and single-family supply fell from 3.7 months to 3.1. This decline in supply should keep home prices stable to higher in coming months. In sum, there was a nice improvement in the housing market at the end of 2024 and it will be important for this to continue. Pending home sales for December will be released later this week, and this index also showed improvement in the final months of the year, rising from 70.6 in August to 79.0 in November. See pages 4 and 5.

The Conference Board consumer confidence index for January was lower but it remains in the middle of the range it has held for the last 3 years. The headline index fell from an upwardly revised 109.5 to 104.1. Both the present conditions and expectations components fell. Similarly, the University of Michigan consumer sentiment index was lower in January after a substantial gain in December. The headline index fell from 74.0 to 71.1; present conditions eased from 75.1 to 74.0 and expectations were down from 73.3 to 69.3. There has been a string of sizeable revisions in both indices in recent months and this makes the overall trend of sentiment surveys difficult to assess. Nevertheless, January’s sentiment readings were much better in January than they were a year ago. See page 6.

In Sum Equity valuation remains high. The SPX trailing 4-quarter operating multiple is 25.7 times, and well above all long- and short-term averages. The 12-month forward PE multiple is 24.2 times and when added to inflation of 2.9%, it comes to 27.1, which is well above the top of the normal range of 14.8 to 23.8. See page 7. By all measures, the equity market remains richly valued and is at levels last seen during the 1997-2000 bubble, the financial crisis of 2008, or the post-COVID-19 earnings slump. However, this has been true for two consecutive years, and it has been ignored. In our view, the odds of better earnings growth in 2025 and 2026 have improved and this may be the most important factor.  

Gail Dudack

Click to Download

President Donald J. Trump declared in his inauguration address that this would be the beginning of great change and a “golden age” for America. Twenty four hours later it became clear that a big change had indeed come to American politics. It began with Trump describing and signing a number of executive orders in front of cheering crowds at his “inauguration parade” at the Capital One Arena in Washington, D.C. This was quickly followed by a press conference in the Oval Office where he signed more executive orders and answered media questions for nearly an hour. This open and accessible president is in sharp contrast to his predecessor, and it was obvious that President Trump has amazing energy for a man his age — because his inaugural day was already very long yet even after these events his day was still far from over. What was also clear is that like him or not, he is a man more determined, more comfortable, and more prepared in his second term in office.

The Goal is Job Growth

On his first full day in office, along with CEO’s from Oracle Corp. (ORCL – $172.57), OpenAI, and SoftBank Group Corp. (9984.T – $10,075.00), President Trump announced a private sector investment of $500 billion to fund artificial intelligence beginning with a $100 billion investment with an ongoing and previously announced massive Texas-based infrastructure project called Stargate. Personally, we found it inspiring to listen to Oracle’s CEO Larry Ellison discuss the possibilities of this project, particularly in the area of diagnosing and curing cancer, which it has as one of its goals. Trump’s role in this project is to facilitate the project from a regulatory perspective. From an economic perspective, it should generate thousands of jobs both in construction and AI and contribute substantially to economic growth and productivity. More importantly, it keeps AI investment in the US rather than making it easier for corporations to move outside our borders.

The financial press is focusing almost entirely on Trump’s tariffs and pardons, but a closer look indicates that the underlying goal of his economic policy is to create good-paying jobs for Americans. Trump’s threat of imposing tariffs on Canada and Mexico is intended to keep US corporations from building outside the US (where there is less regulation and lower taxes) and to keep good paying jobs at home. In addition, other countries impose tariffs on our exports to them in order to protect their companies, and President Trump is looking to even the playing field and reduce our trade deficit by encouraging countries to offset our imports of their goods by purchasing our American goods and services. In short, President Trump enjoys negotiating and dealmaking.

Whether any of this will work and create a golden age is unknown, but it certainly is a change. Around the world stock markets opened cautiously in anticipation of President Trump’s first day in office, but in the US the day ended with a gain of 538 points in the Dow Jones Industrial Average and with the S&P 500 index moving back above the 6000 level. Equally important was the fact that the yield on the 10-year Treasury bond fell to 4.57% after recently moving as high as 4.8% in recent days. Still, the most important factor of the session was that companies were reporting good profits for the fourth quarter. Companies that beat analysts’ expectations on the first day of this shortened week included Charles Schwab Corp. (SCHW – $80.93), 3M Company (MMM – $146.89), Capital One Financial Corp. (COF – $193.21), D.R. Horton Inc. (DHI – $143.70). KeyCorp (KEY – $17.64), United Airlines Holdings Inc. (UAL – $110.52), and Netflix Inc. (NFLX – $869.68). Note that these better-than-expected earnings results materialized in a wide range of sectors, which is excellent news. Investors have reason to be encouraged by this combination of lower long-term interest rates and rising earnings.

Technical Improvement

Despite a selloff and a bearish tilt in sentiment in the early weeks of 2025, the charts of the popular indices do not reflect anything other than a normal pause in an uptrend. The S&P 500, Dow Jones Industrial Average, and Nasdaq Composite all appear to have successfully tested their 100-day moving averages. More importantly, the Russell 2000 index, which has been the weakest index of all, appears to have successfully tested its 200-day moving average. This is important. See page 9. In all cases, the longer-term uptrends remain intact.

The 25-day up/down volume oscillator is 0.52 this week, neutral, but up significantly from a week ago and this neutralizes the risk of an imminent oversold reading. The recent weakness in breadth data broke an uptrend in breadth that has been in place since the October 2022 low. In short, momentum was the weakest in over two years in early January, but this oscillator is now rebounding. This is favorable because an oversold reading that lasts more than five consecutive trading sessions is a warning and would suggest a decline of more than 10% is on the horizon. See page 10.

Last week’s AAII survey showed bullishness fell 9.3% to 25.4% and bearishness rose 3.2% to 40.6%. Bullishness is now below average (and closing in on the positive 25% level), and bearishness is above average for the third time in eight weeks. It would be unusual for the equity market to have a significant decline with public bullishness this low. See page 12.

Economic News is Mixed, but Fine

December’s CPI report was viewed favorably by investors because headline CPI rose from 2.7% YOY to 2.9% but core CPI fell from 3.3% YOY to 3.2%. In reality, the pace of headline CPI rose a mere 0.4% from 2.749% in November to 2.888% in December. Similarly, the decline in core CPI from November to December was only 0.08%. In other words, there was little change in the rate of inflation in December. This is favorable; however, the current trend of inflation is ambiguous. This ambiguity is partially explained by the chart on page 3 that shows housing inflation has flattened but remains high and above 4%. Meanwhile, medical care pricing is decelerating, while transportation and food prices are rising. In sum, inflation is not one-dimensional, which is what makes it difficult to control or predict. However, if President Trump’s goal of producing more US oil lowers energy prices, this will dampen inflation.

The NAHB single-family index rose one point to 47 in January, due in large part to present sales which rose 3 points and traffic of potential buyers which gained 2 points. However, the next six months sales index fell 6 points to 60. Housing starts jumped 16% in the month of December but were still 4.4% below a year earlier. Single-family housing starts were 2.6% lower than December 2024. Permits were 3.1% lower YOY and single-family permits were down 2.5% YOY. In general, data shows residential construction was decelerating at year end, but homebuilders’ optimism is rising. See page 8. December’s total retail and food sales lagged expectations; however, headline sales grew 3.9% YOY, which was just under the 4.1% seen in November. Overall, it was the fourth straight month of solid sales. See page 6. Year over year gains were led by auto dealers, furniture stores, nonstore retailers, and electronic and appliance stores. Goods pricing is falling which undermines total reported sales, and high interest rates are a hurdle for high-priced items, nevertheless, this report translates into a rather impressive performance for retailers in December. In sum, economic news supports equities.  

Gail Dudack

Click to Download

This strategy weekly is being written prior to the release of December’s CPI report, and many commentators are suggesting that the report could be a market moving event. Most economists are expecting inflation to trend lower in 2024, but with the caveat that tariffs could increase inflation. However, December’s CPI report is coming out before tariffs can be used as an excuse for inflation, and if inflation is higher than expected, the market is apt to respond poorly.

This belated fear of inflation – belated because inflation data has already been flat to higher for several months — is hiding another issue which we have discussed previously. The underlying issue of this inflation fear, in our view, is that stock prices have been driven up by speculators betting on an accommodative and rate-cutting Federal Reserve to support the financial markets and their investments. In our view, a fear of inflation and higher interest rates is irrational at this juncture since a stronger economy that provides good corporate earnings growth should counterbalance the risk of higher interest rates. In other words, the real concern for investors should be earnings growth. Nonetheless, if inflation fears shake out speculation in the equity market, it is a good thing in the long run. Speculators are the icing on the cake, the real cake is investors who buy for fundamentals not momentum. Momentum works in the short-term; fundamentals work in the long term. In sum, focusing on fourth quarter earnings results and corporate projections for this year are the important issues in coming weeks.

However, as the 10-year Treasury bond yield rises to 4.78%, analysts have begun to focus on the S&P 500’s earnings yield and are concerned. We see this shift in the consensus’ focus from momentum to fundamentals to be a long-term positive.

The earnings yield (earnings divided by the S&P 500 price) is a good short cut for assessing the appeal of stocks versus bonds; however, like most fundamental benchmarks, it varies depending upon one’s inputs. The current IBES 2025 earnings estimate of $273.91 creates an earnings yield of 4.7% and the S&P/Dow Jones estimate of $271.22 generates an earnings yield of 4.6%. These are in line with, or slightly below the current bond yield, however, stocks also have a dividend yield. The current dividend yield of 1.3% generates a total equity yield of 6% for equities. This means the earnings yield still favors equities, but by a slim margin. The risk is that things could change later this year. Bond yields, which are threatening the 5% level, could move higher this year, which is why some institutional investors are shifting money from equities to bonds. Still, earnings growth in 2025 could be better than expected and this would favor equities. However, if the economy is stronger than expected and interest rates move higher (a natural event in a strong economy), earnings growth could exceed expectations and continue to favor equities. In short, earnings growth and higher interest rates can exist together, and history shows that this is often the case.

Data Shows Strength

Most recent economic releases are pointing to a stronger economy. The NFIB small business optimism index jumped 3.4 points in December to 105.1, the highest level since October 2018 and the second consecutive month above the long-term average of 98. The uncertainty index plunged 12 points to 86, its lowest level in six months. Both indices are showing great optimism after the re-election of Donald Trump, which is not a surprise given the promise of less regulation, lower energy prices, and a business-friendly environment; however, this is the opposite of the tone of many financial articles. A bigger surprise in the survey was the improvement reported in actual sales and earnings in December. Although the net index remains in negative territory, the actual earnings index increased from a low of -37 in August to -26 in December. Similarly, actual sales trends improved from a low of -20 in October to -13 in December. Small business owners also showed great expectations for the economy (up 16 points to 52), sales expectations (up 8 to 22), and credit conditions (up 3 to -2). See pages 3 and 4.

December’s employment report was much stronger than expected with an increase of 256,000 jobs and the unemployment rate inching down to 4.1%. What impressed us more was the improvement in the household survey which indicated an increase of 478,000 jobs and a decrease of 235,000 unemployed during the month. This combination lowered the unemployment rate to 4.1%.

Our favorite indicators are the year-over-year increases in jobs as reported by the establishment and the household surveys. In December, the establishment survey indicated job growth of 1.4% YOY, slightly below the long-term average of 1.7%, but still a healthy increase. The household survey showed jobs growing 0.3% YOY, which is low, however, it was an important reversal from the 0.4% YOY decline reported in November. The household survey has been on our radar because of the negative growth rate seen in November, so this report was good news. See page 5.

The December jobs report was also in line with the recently released JOLTS report for November. This report showed total nonfarm job openings of 259,000, with the majority of these openings in the professional and business services sector. This was a favorable development; however, it does not explain why the decline in the unemployment rate in December was greatest for those with less than a high school degree. The unemployment rate for this group had been as high as 7% in August but fell from 6% to 5.6% at yearend. The unemployment rate for those with a bachelor’s degree or higher fell from 2.5% to 2.4%. In sum, the job market has been improving on many levels. See page 6. In addition, average weekly earnings grew 3.5% YOY in December, which remains above the level of inflation which is currently 2.75%. This means real earnings are increasing. See page 7.

However, there is a potential problem for interest rates in 2025 and it may not be inflation. White House data indicates that the fiscal 2024 deficit was $1.5 trillion or 6.6% of GDP. This is well above the long-term average of deficits-to-GDP of 3.6%. The White House estimates the current fiscal 2025 deficit will be $1.4 trillion, representing 6.1% of GDP. These deficit levels are unsustainable and represent a major challenge for the incoming administration. Interest payments on government debt totaled $881.7 billion in fiscal year 2024 which was 13.1% of total government outlays and is up from 5.3% in fiscal 2020. See page 9. Our only consolation is that the incoming administration has focused on the deficit as a problem, rather than ignoring it.

Market and Breadth

Many prognosticators are turning bearish for 2025, however, to date, the charts of the indices do not reflect anything other than a normal pause in an uptrend. The S&P 500 is testing its 100-day moving average, the DJIA is trading slightly below its average, and the Nasdaq Composite is trading well above this benchmark. The Russell 2000 is the index to watch since it is getting perilously close to testing its 200-day moving average. This will be an important test of market strength or weakness. See page 13.

The 25-day up/down volume oscillator is at negative 2.01 this week, neutral, but down significantly from a week ago and potentially closing in on an oversold reading of minus 3.0 or less. An oversold reading that lasts more than five consecutive trading sessions is a warning and would be a signal that the bullish momentum that has been in place since the October 2022 low has been broken and a decline of more than 10% is on the horizon. Again, an important test is on the horizon for the equity market. See page 14.

Gail Dudack

Click to Download